Poor people are violent

 To be poor is to be violent

We have once again encountered pressing social dilemmas.

Some justify violence and vandalism with poverty or material danger.

Still others hold their heads when it is necessary to pay for damages or they have suffered injuries.

The reality in real everyday life is that some people make something with their income, while others spend all their money on drugs and alcohol. On top of all that, some people who are under the influence of drugs and alcohol are also violent and vandals and often cause material damage. Alcohol and drugs have also become an excuse for violence and vandalism.

The fact is that, despite the fact that some people are financially threatened or, in the vernacular, receive funds from public funds or social assistance, they pay in the store, do not break things, pay expenses and are generally not violent or vandals.

These facts apply to both adults and children.

Excusing violence and vandalism or stealing from shops and houses and flats or factories or simply alienating other people's property because of poverty is not appropriate.

Such interpretations of responsibility for actions can lead to the legalization of criminal acts, if of course you can prove that you are poor or financially threatened. And, of course, the stigmatization of the poor, that all the poor are also violent, vandals, criminals or, in general, perpetrators of criminal acts.