Fundamental social bonds

 

 Humans like to be social or in company, despite the fact that anthropologists sometimes explained that the ancestor of man was a rather solitary creature.

It was only because of the need for joint defense or hunting of larger animals that man began to think of uniting in some sort of troops or groups. The so-called family organization was also quite familiar, which could be organized according to a common ancestor into a clan organization or clans of one common ancestor. And so it should be more effective in defending its habitats and hunting. And, of course, this is how the tendency towards mass appeared, as they were supposed to be more efficient that way.

Later in historical development people began to think about animal husbandry or domestication of animals, instead of hunting wild animals and even agriculture, instead of picking the fruits of plants that naturally grew in nature. Of course, with this hunting and gathering, an even greater struggle for territory began, or rather the appropriation of territory and the marking of territory and, of course, the tendency to expand.

The struggle for food and power is already familiar to all animal species, including humans. Likewise, the attempt to appropriate a certain territory and thus the defense of this territory. And with defense came the law of the stronger and more skilled, and of course appeared the need for social organization or hierarchy and the emergence of leaders of tribes, tropes, clans and the like.

Man as a social or social being is more a matter of the modern organization of society or tribe or group of people. But this also includes the concept of a family man, or a man who takes care of his offspring or kids and, if necessary, his partners. Although this kind of basic or fundamental bond can also be observed in some animal species.

A social person, in addition to family socializing and the work environment, has a need for socializing outside the family or work environment and, of course, also the need for free time, or time without work and family obligations.

Although sometimes this social person became, in extreme cases, quite a social person who was more interested in social life than family life. Complaints from their intimate friends or partners often occurred that friends and acquaintances and colleagues matter more to them and because of this they neglect their intimate friends or family companions or even their children. Likewise, such merely social individuals may neglect their work obligations in their basic social work organization, which may or may not be family.

People also like extremes, and because of this, there are always new debates about balancing a professional career, family and friends, or even social life.

Thus, we always reflect on our conception of the fundamental social bond and, of course, also in which space we will classify it. It is also worth considering which social space comes first in our lives and why. This is what human involvement in everyday life looks like, and of course also the human problem of surviving through the best and less stressful path through life.