The pitfalls of nonviolent behavior

 Several times throughout the development period of man from early childhood to adulthood, non-violent behavior was at least sometimes pointed out. In any case, aggression should at least be corrected. This is how we should create a future peaceful, empathetic modern social and social adult.

The violent primary or instinctive behavior of a person, who is very quickly in conflict with other people for the goods of life and even for power over others, should thus lead, through the historical development of a person more similar to primates or a solitary human being, who had difficulty creating a wider society, to a modern peaceful social person. At least this is how the modern educational and training model of separating a person from a primate or a human being should proceed. 

Of course, in contrast to this model, the old model of at least a defensive strategy of education has reappeared. Namely, people find it difficult to live in peace with other people or groups of people. The original explanations of the need for military or weapons skills were based on the instinctive tendency, of course of other people or groups, to conquer foreign territory or subjugate other people or groups, tribes or peoples.

Thus, the human tendency to live and create in peace and respect the rights of others and the ancient tendency to assert superiority over others through weapons or warfare came into paradox. With this, the old need for violent behavior towards others was reasserted. Very often, calm, so-called civilized people were actually victims of barbaric, violent primitive gangs, because due to their non-violent behavior and poorly developed military strategies or the development of ever-new weapons, others easily subjugated them.

Thus, even today we are dealing with the paradox of the tendency for peaceful coexistence between people, ethnic groups and nations and the peaceful resolution of disputes, and the tendency for military superiority, which would serve to dominate or even exterminate different, but above all peaceful, people. New conflicts and war zones are emerging more and more frequently, proving to us again and again that it is not good to completely abandon our primal violent behaviors. Thus, we can come to the conclusion that we must maintain violent behavior in our human nature or, precisely because of such violent war phenomena, at least for defensive purposes.